<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Genealogy in New South Wales Blog &#187; Northern Territory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/category/northern-territory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog</link>
	<description>Information and opinions about genealogy in New South Wales and beyond to help you understand your ancestors better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Australian Electoral Rolls on Ancestry</title>
		<link>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/</link>
		<comments>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electoral Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ancestry seems to have added more Australian electoral rolls onto ancestry.com.au without any great fanfare. At least, if there was one I missed it, and I didn&#8217;t get an update about it. They now cover the period from 1903 to 1954, although the coverage isn&#8217;t complete, nor is it the same for each state. Here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fmore-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fmore-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry%2F&amp;source=NSWGenealogy&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Ancestry seems to have added more Australian electoral rolls onto ancestry.com.au without any great fanfare. At least, if there was one I missed it, and I didn&#8217;t get an update about it. They now cover the period from 1903 to 1954, although the coverage isn&#8217;t complete, nor is it the same for each state.</p>
<p>Here is the list, blatantly cut-and-pasted from their website.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>State and Years Presently Included:</strong></p>
<p>This database currently includes electoral rolls for the following states and years. Those marked by asterisk have been indexed. Others are image-only.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Australian Capital Territory:</strong> 1928*, 1929-31, 1935*, 1937*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>New South Wales:</strong> 1930*, 1931-32, 1933*, 1934-35, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1953-54*</li>
<li><strong>Northern Territory:</strong> 1922*, 1928, 1929*, 1930-31, 1934*, 1937*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Queensland:</strong> 1903*, 1905*, 1906, 1908-10, 1912, 1913*, 1914-17, 1919*, 1921*, 1922, 1925*, 1926, 1928-29, 1930*, 1931-32, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Tasmania:</strong> 1914*, 1915-17, 1919*, 1921, 1922*, 1925, 1928*, 1929-31, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943-44*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Victoria:</strong> 1856*, 1903*, 1905-06, 1908, 1909*, 1910, 1912-13, 1914*, 1915-18, 1919*, 1920-22, 1924*, 1925-28, 1931*, 1932-35, 1936-37*, 1942-43*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Western Australia:</strong> 1901*, 1905, 1906*, 1909, 1910-11*, 1912-15, 1916*, 1917-22, 1925*, 1926, 1928-30, 1931*, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Take note of the years that are indexed and those that are not.</p>
<p>Full details <a href="http://search.ancestry.com.au/iexec/?htx=List&amp;dbid=1207&amp;offerid=0%3a7858%3a0" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>I did a test drive of a roll without going through the index. My Eason family was in Blayney until the mid-1950s, so I went searching for them in the 1954 roll. I know from searching previously for an earlier period that they were likely to be in the Commonwealth Division of Macquarie, State Division of Bathurst, Blayney Subdivision, so I went searching there first. I know that boundaries change over the years but you have to start somewhere and I started there.</p>
<p>I selected <strong>New South Wales</strong>, then <strong>1954</strong>, then <strong>MacQuarie</strong> (as spelled by Ancestry). I then selected <strong>Bathurst</strong>, and <strong>E</strong> for the initial of my ancestor.</p>
<p>The page that came up was for the Subdivision of Bathurst, which I didn&#8217;t notice, so I then went back and searched for other divisions and subdivisions. Eventually I noticed that there were a number of pages for each selection, so I went back to Bathurst and there were 4 pages, of which I was on the first one. I moved on to page 2, which was still Bathurst, but page 3 was Blayney. There they were!</p>
<div id="attachment_295" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><img class="size-full wp-image-295" title="1954 Macquarie-Blayney Eason Ancestry" src="http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/1954-Macquarie-Blayney-Eason-Ancestry.jpg" alt="1954 Electoral Roll Macquarie Division Blayney Subdivision" width="350" height="328" /><p class="wp-caption-text">1954 Electoral Roll Macquarie Division Blayney Subdivision</p></div>
<p>You can see it&#8217;s not a brilliant image. I&#8217;ve also cropped the black border around the image. The surnames don&#8217;t quite disappear into the binding on the right hand page, although on other pages they do. Still, it&#8217;s available on your subscription at home, if you have one, or at your library, if you don&#8217;t, without looking at microfiche, which aren&#8217;t indexed either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
