<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Genealogy in New South Wales Blog &#187; Tasmania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/category/australia/tasmania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog</link>
	<description>Information and opinions about genealogy in New South Wales and beyond to help you understand your ancestors better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scottish convict records at the National Archives of Scotland</title>
		<link>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/scottish-convict-records-at-the-national-archives-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/scottish-convict-records-at-the-national-archives-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Convicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that you can search for your Scottish convict by name in the catalogue of the National Archives of Scotland? I didn&#8217;t until recently. I am researching one John Graham who, it was claimed on his death certificate, arrived in the colonies when he was about 16 and spent may have spent some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fscottish-convict-records-at-the-national-archives-of-scotland%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fscottish-convict-records-at-the-national-archives-of-scotland%2F&amp;source=NSWGenealogy&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.nas.gov.uk"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-489" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="National Archives of Scotland" src="http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/NAS-homeImg12-300x171.jpg" alt="National Archives of Scotland" width="300" height="171" /></a>Did you know that you can search for your Scottish convict by name in the <a href="http://www.nas.gov.uk/onlineCatalogue/" target="_blank">catalogue</a> of the <a href="http://www.nas.gov.uk" target="_blank">National Archives of Scotland</a>?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t until recently. I am researching one John Graham who, it was claimed on his death certificate, arrived in the colonies when he was about 16 and spent may have spent some time in Tasmania. A search of all the usual arrival options to New South Wales proved unsuccessful but there was a suitable candidate transported to Van Diemen&#8217;s Land at a young age.</p>
<p>Further research at the excellent <a href="http://www.archives.tas.gov.au/" target="_blank">Archives Office of Tasmania</a><a href="http://www.statelibrary.tas.gov.au/tasmemory/digitisedall" target="_blank"> digitised content website</a> showed that this John Graham came from Scotland. His 7 year term was timed perfectly for him to serve it, move to New South Wales, get married and start his family.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nas.gov.uk/onlineCatalogue/" target="_blank">catalogue of the National Archives of Scotland</a> has indexed convict trial records by name. A search for the name John Graham gave far too many results to be useful, but narrowing the date range down to when I knew (from the Tasmanian records) that his trial took place, and there he was. Twice.</p>
<p>The precognition (AD14/39/95) showed that he was tried with Thomas McKay, who appears next to him on the convict indent. Under the heading  &#8217;Accused&#8217;  they are both named, as is his father and his father&#8217;s occupation, and their residence:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>John</strong> <strong>Graham</strong>, son of Peter <strong>Graham</strong>, weaver, Small&#8217;s Wynd, Dundee<br />
Thomas McKay, son of Donald McKay, painter, Hawkhill, Dundee</p></blockquote>
<p>The trial papers (JC26/1839/5) give even more information:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>John</strong> <strong>Graham</strong>, son of Peter <strong>Graham</strong>, weaver, Small&#8217;s Wynd, Dundee, Verdict: Guilty, Verdict Comments: Guilty in terms of own confession, Sentence: Transportation &#8211; 7 years. Note: Pannel cannot write.<br />
Thomas <strong>McKay</strong>, son of Donald <strong>McKay</strong>, painter, Hawkhill, Dundee, Verdict: Guilty, Verdict Comments: Guilty in terms of own confession, Sentence: Transportation &#8211; 7 years. Note: Pannel cannot write.</p></blockquote>
<p>Requesting copies of these records is not so straightforward, but it can be done. It appeared that the only way to do so from the other side of the world was to request a quote by email, so I wrote to the enquiry email address <a href="mailto:enquiries@nas.gov.uk">enquiries@nas.gov.uk</a> asking for one, giving the first reference that I&#8217;d found.</p>
<p>I got an email back a few days later with a very detailed list of what was in both files:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Precognition (ref: AD14/39/95)</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>A Precognition is the written report of the evidence of witnesses to a crime, taken before the trial in order to help prepare the case against the accused. This particular Precognition contains the following items:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bound Precognition, this includes the witness statements and the      declarations of both John Graham and Thomas McKay [74 pages]</li>
<li>Printed Indictment [7 pages]</li>
<li>Inventory of Papers in Precognition [3 pages]</li>
<li>Schedule [2 pages]</li>
<li>Petition [6 pages]</li>
<li>Letters [2 pages]</li>
<li>Supplementary Schedule [2 pages]</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>74 pages of witness statements and declarations! Priceless!</p>
<blockquote><p>The Court Process Papers (ref: <strong>JC26/1839/5</strong>) contain the following items:</p>
<ul>
<li> Handwritten      Indictment [13 pages]</li>
<li>Diligence      [2 pages]</li>
<li>List      of Assize [2 pages]</li>
<li>Execution      against John Graham [2 pages]</li>
<li>Execution      against Thomas McKay [2 pages]</li>
<li>Execution      against witnesses [4 pages]</li>
<li>Declaration      of John Graham [4 pages]</li>
<li>Declaration      of Thomas McKay [4 pages]</li>
<li>2<sup>nd</sup> declaration of John Graham [4 pages]</li>
<li>2<sup>nd</sup> declaration of Thomas McKay [4 pages]</li>
<li>Extract      Conviction [5 pages]</li>
<li>Complaint      against Robert Burt, James Downie, Duncan Carswell, James Robertson and      Thomas McKay [2 pages]</li>
<li>Extract      Certified Copy Complaint [4 pages]</li>
<li>Complaint      against Archibald Paterson &amp; John Graham [2 pages]</li>
<li>Complaint      against John Graham [2 pages]</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I was also given the option of a Minute Book entry:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The Minute Book Entry (ref: JC11/86)</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>This is a handwritten summary of the proceedings in court, and includes the charge, the plea and the sentence handed down [2 pages]</p></blockquote>
<p>The quote was given separately for each file, and was not for the faint-hearted, although considerably cheaper than a trip to Edinburgh. We are going ahead with it, so I&#8217;ll report on what comes back when the package arrives.</p>
<p>Payment is by cheque on a British account (which I don&#8217;t have) or an international money order, or by credit card over the phone. They hope to provide online payments in the future. Postage and packing is included.</p>
<p>As much as I wish that they offered a similar service to the National Archives of Australia where you can pay a small amount to have something they intend to digitise scanned early, such as the World War II service files, I am still impressed that I was able to do so much from my PC here in Sydney.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the copies to arrive!</p>
<p><em>Image by courtesy of the National Archives of Scotland</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/scottish-convict-records-at-the-national-archives-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Australian Electoral Rolls on Ancestry</title>
		<link>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/</link>
		<comments>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electoral Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ancestry seems to have added more Australian electoral rolls onto ancestry.com.au without any great fanfare. At least, if there was one I missed it, and I didn&#8217;t get an update about it. They now cover the period from 1903 to 1954, although the coverage isn&#8217;t complete, nor is it the same for each state. Here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fmore-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fheritagegenealogy.com.au%2Fblog%2Fmore-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry%2F&amp;source=NSWGenealogy&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Ancestry seems to have added more Australian electoral rolls onto ancestry.com.au without any great fanfare. At least, if there was one I missed it, and I didn&#8217;t get an update about it. They now cover the period from 1903 to 1954, although the coverage isn&#8217;t complete, nor is it the same for each state.</p>
<p>Here is the list, blatantly cut-and-pasted from their website.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>State and Years Presently Included:</strong></p>
<p>This database currently includes electoral rolls for the following states and years. Those marked by asterisk have been indexed. Others are image-only.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Australian Capital Territory:</strong> 1928*, 1929-31, 1935*, 1937*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>New South Wales:</strong> 1930*, 1931-32, 1933*, 1934-35, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1953-54*</li>
<li><strong>Northern Territory:</strong> 1922*, 1928, 1929*, 1930-31, 1934*, 1937*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Queensland:</strong> 1903*, 1905*, 1906, 1908-10, 1912, 1913*, 1914-17, 1919*, 1921*, 1922, 1925*, 1926, 1928-29, 1930*, 1931-32, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Tasmania:</strong> 1914*, 1915-17, 1919*, 1921, 1922*, 1925, 1928*, 1929-31, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943-44*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Victoria:</strong> 1856*, 1903*, 1905-06, 1908, 1909*, 1910, 1912-13, 1914*, 1915-18, 1919*, 1920-22, 1924*, 1925-28, 1931*, 1932-35, 1936-37*, 1942-43*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
<li><strong>Western Australia:</strong> 1901*, 1905, 1906*, 1909, 1910-11*, 1912-15, 1916*, 1917-22, 1925*, 1926, 1928-30, 1931*, 1934, 1936-37*, 1943*, 1949*, 1954*</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Take note of the years that are indexed and those that are not.</p>
<p>Full details <a href="http://search.ancestry.com.au/iexec/?htx=List&amp;dbid=1207&amp;offerid=0%3a7858%3a0" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>I did a test drive of a roll without going through the index. My Eason family was in Blayney until the mid-1950s, so I went searching for them in the 1954 roll. I know from searching previously for an earlier period that they were likely to be in the Commonwealth Division of Macquarie, State Division of Bathurst, Blayney Subdivision, so I went searching there first. I know that boundaries change over the years but you have to start somewhere and I started there.</p>
<p>I selected <strong>New South Wales</strong>, then <strong>1954</strong>, then <strong>MacQuarie</strong> (as spelled by Ancestry). I then selected <strong>Bathurst</strong>, and <strong>E</strong> for the initial of my ancestor.</p>
<p>The page that came up was for the Subdivision of Bathurst, which I didn&#8217;t notice, so I then went back and searched for other divisions and subdivisions. Eventually I noticed that there were a number of pages for each selection, so I went back to Bathurst and there were 4 pages, of which I was on the first one. I moved on to page 2, which was still Bathurst, but page 3 was Blayney. There they were!</p>
<div id="attachment_295" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><img class="size-full wp-image-295" title="1954 Macquarie-Blayney Eason Ancestry" src="http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/1954-Macquarie-Blayney-Eason-Ancestry.jpg" alt="1954 Electoral Roll Macquarie Division Blayney Subdivision" width="350" height="328" /><p class="wp-caption-text">1954 Electoral Roll Macquarie Division Blayney Subdivision</p></div>
<p>You can see it&#8217;s not a brilliant image. I&#8217;ve also cropped the black border around the image. The surnames don&#8217;t quite disappear into the binding on the right hand page, although on other pages they do. Still, it&#8217;s available on your subscription at home, if you have one, or at your library, if you don&#8217;t, without looking at microfiche, which aren&#8217;t indexed either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heritagegenealogy.com.au/blog/more-australian-electoral-rolls-on-ancestry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
